Skip to main content

Spiritual Poison: the Many Faith Destroying Mistakes of the Jesus Project



If you have been following along with my posts you will have noted a long list of the errors of the Jesus Project.  In this post I will revisit some of those and point out some others.  Certainly, the staff of the Presbyterian Community Church of the Rockies are aware of these problems.  So, you may ask, why would they invite the error laden Jesus Project to present the faith sapping results of their poor scholarship to the body of Christ in Estes Park?  The only explanation possible is that they too share the same anti-Christ agenda of the Westar Institute.  That brings me to the first of their mistakes:

Agenda Drive Scholarship.  As I pointed out in my first post, the founder of the Jesus Seminar started out with an explicit agenda to undermine orthodox Christianity.  In fact, in 1998 Funk explained his vision for the future of the faith in a paper entitled The Coming Radical Reformation.  Here is one of his assertions: “The resurrection of Jesus did not involve the resuscitation of a corpse.”  Of course, in saying this he was not affirming what Paul wrote in 1 Corinthians 15:1—11.  In fact, he was denying it altogether.  In this paper Funk laid out the agenda of the Jesus seminar.  He then hand-picked men and women who agreed with His position and threw in a smattering of others to provide a veneer of objectivity. 

The current incarnation of the Jesus Seminar continues on the same path that Funk blazed.  The council of nineteen are mere flunkies who can be counted on to continue the agenda pioneered nearly twenty years ago.  This is not scholarship but propaganda. 

Ignoring recent scholarship.  The assertion that to get at the real Jesus or the real New Testament we have to go beyond what the Christian faith and theology have always trusted would be laughable if it were not so spiritually lethal.  The Jesus Seminar’s treatment of the scriptures is rooted in the rationalism of the 1800’s not in the unbiased scholarship and research of the 2000’s.  Richard Bauckham for instance published Jesus and the Eyewitnesses: The Gospels as Eyewitness Testimony in 2006.  As is perfectly obvious from the title Bauckham’s thesis, which he proves in the book, is that the Gospels are reliable records of the words and works of Jesus written by eyewitnesses for the benefit of the church.

Similarly, attempts to water down the New Testament by mixing in recently discovered books, songs, and prayers have been successfully rebuffed for the last 100 years.  Nevertheless, the leadership of the Presbyterian Community Church of the Rockies seem to think that the Christian community in Estes Park needs to be instructed by a small group of self-aggrandizing, self-appointed “spiritual leaders” have corrected the wrongs of the ancient church.

Xenophobia.  Am I the only one who finds it odd that the “spiritual leaders” who have taken it upon themselves to be judges over the books of the New Testament are all north American?  The church is a 2000 year old world-wide movement under the guidance of a diversity of church leaders who have found the scriptures to be reliable and true.  It is widely known that the leaders of the churches in Africa, Asia, and Latin America have decidedly more orthodox views than the men and women who were recruited by Hal Taussig to continue the agenda of the Jesus Seminar.  Taussig’s apparent xenophobia is rooted in his anti-Christian agenda.  His predilection for “spiritual leaders” instead of “church leaders” shows his contempt for the church and those leaders in the church who are charged to ensure it remains, as Paul wrote, “the pillar and support of the truth” (1 Timothy 3:15)

Hubris.  Hal Taussig’s gang of nineteen are nothing more that self-interested men and women who desperately want to be taken seriously.  They have had the audacity to claim authority that no other group has claimed in the history of the Church until the council of Trent in 1545.  Up to that year the New Testament books themselves were recognized to be authoritative by the whole church.  At the council of Trent, the Roman Catholic Church, desperate to find support for some of their more outrageous doctrines, identified an authoritative list of books.  Note the difference between books recognized to be intrinsically authoritative, and an authoritative list of books.  The gang of nineteen departs from the protestant and eastern orthodox churches in using the Roman Catholic tactic of adding books to achieve their agenda.  However, considering the books the gang of nineteen is adding, I doubt even the Roman Catholics would have them.


My prayer for the body of Christ in Estes Park is that they would reject the faith destroying work of the Presbyterian Community Church of the Rockies and stay away from the Westar Institute’s Jesus Seminar.  One need only examine the decline of the Presbyterian Church U.S.A. to see that their view of the Bible and the resulting theology is church destroying and not edifying to men and women of faith.  What is true nationally is just as true locally.  Click HERE to see what radical skepticism and disbelief do to a local community of faith.  The plethora of errors and decline of congregations which embrace them prove that what they sponsor and teach is nothing less than spiritual poison.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

No Need to Mind the Gap

The “Gap Theory” of Gn. 1:1-2 holds that there was an indeterminately long gap of time between Gn. 1:1 and Gn. 1:2.  During this period of time Satan fell, a pre-adamic race populated the earth, sin entered into the world, and God brought judgment in the form of a flood on His original creation.  Gn. 1:2 therefore is not an account of original creation but rather an account of the re-creation of the earth. This view was held Thomas Chalmers, Franz Delitzsh, Arthur Pink.  Some early dispensationalists such as Arno Gaebelein,  C.I. Scofield and Lewis Sperry Chafer.   Sweetnam and Magnum in their work “The Scofield Bible: Its History and Impact on the Evangelical Church” believed that the gap theory was adopted by Scofield as a way to reconcile the emerging evidence of an old earth, with the biblical account of creation.   Three arguments, syntactical, contextual, and historical are usually advanced to support a gap between Gn. 1:1 and Gn. 1:2. ...

A Nation with No Land? Give Me a Break!

The relationship between God, Israel, and the land has been a topic of theological and geo-political significance since the establishment of the Abrahamic Covenant in approximately 1900 B.C.   With the birth of the modern state of Israel on 14 May 1948 questions about God, Israel, and the land have taken on new urgency for both politics, academia, and the popular press. Politically, Israel’s right to occupy their biblical homeland is under diplomatic and military assault.  In the academy, recent studies deny that God has made an eternal promise to provide and preserve a homeland for Israel.  In addition, books aimed at a popular audience, blogs, and ministry leaders are also denying that God has committed Himself to the preservation of a land for Israel. Politics, academics, and culture converge every two years at the Christ at the Checkpoint Conference .   Munther Isaac is the driving force behind this conference.  Here is how he describes it: "In t...