Skip to main content

Everyone Starts Somewhere



Everyone starts somewhere, and starting points abound. Each life begins at the starting point of conception. Each new day dawns full of hope and anticipation. Marriage, a new semester, a new job, a new exercise routine, a new diet are all starting points of one kind or another. Each starting point allows us to set or renew our intention and direction. The ancient Hebrew wisdom in the Book of Proverbs reminds us that foundational to any starting point is the fear of the Lord. In other words the starting point of all starting points is to Fear God.

Fear is not something that we readily embrace. In fact, it is something we do our best to avoid.  That is of course unless you like roller coasters or skydiving. Yet the Bible tells us to embrace the fear of God. What does it mean to fear God? It is simply to acknowledge that He exists.  To know God is to fear Him. But why, is He mean or vindictive? No, He is good but He is not predictable. A real God will do as He pleases, when He pleases, and how he pleases. He doesn’t check it with us first. We need to check in with Him.

But what God should we acknowledge? Is it the god of Islam, a Native American god, Buddha, the god of Mormonism? Maybe any old God would do. After all, don’t all religions lead to the same god? Our answer is right in front of us. Notice how the word “LORD” is in all capital letters in Proverbs 1:7? That is the translators way of letting us know that behind that translation is the name of the God of the Bible, Yahweh. It is the God of the Bible we are to fear and no other.

So as you embrace your next starting point check in with the God of the Bible.  First acknowledge that He exists and ask Him to give you knowledge, wisdom, and instruction as you start out.  But be ready to be disrupted! He is good but not predictable.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

No Need to Mind the Gap

The “Gap Theory” of Gn. 1:1-2 holds that there was an indeterminately long gap of time between Gn. 1:1 and Gn. 1:2.  During this period of time Satan fell, a pre-adamic race populated the earth, sin entered into the world, and God brought judgment in the form of a flood on His original creation.  Gn. 1:2 therefore is not an account of original creation but rather an account of the re-creation of the earth. This view was held Thomas Chalmers, Franz Delitzsh, Arthur Pink.  Some early dispensationalists such as Arno Gaebelein,  C.I. Scofield and Lewis Sperry Chafer.   Sweetnam and Magnum in their work “The Scofield Bible: Its History and Impact on the Evangelical Church” believed that the gap theory was adopted by Scofield as a way to reconcile the emerging evidence of an old earth, with the biblical account of creation.   Three arguments, syntactical, contextual, and historical are usually advanced to support a gap between Gn. 1:1 and Gn. 1:2. First, syntactically some con

Spiritual Poison: the Many Faith Destroying Mistakes of the Jesus Project

If you have been following along with my posts you will have noted a long list of the errors of the Jesus Project.   In this post I will revisit some of those and point out some others.   Certainly, the staff of the Presbyterian Community Church of the Rockies are aware of these problems.   So, you may ask, why would they invite the error laden Jesus Project to present the faith sapping results of their poor scholarship to the body of Christ in Estes Park?   The only explanation possible is that they too share the same anti-Christ agenda of the Westar Institute.   That brings me to the first of their mistakes: Agenda Drive Scholarship.   As I pointed out in my first post, the founder of the Jesus Seminar started out with an explicit agenda to undermine orthodox Christianity.   In fact, in 1998 Funk explained his vision for the future of the faith in a paper entitled The Coming Radical Reformation .   Here is one of his assertions: “The resurrection of Jesus did not involve the r

A Nation with No Land? Give Me a Break!

The relationship between God, Israel, and the land has been a topic of theological and geo-political significance since the establishment of the Abrahamic Covenant in approximately 1900 B.C.   With the birth of the modern state of Israel on 14 May 1948 questions about God, Israel, and the land have taken on new urgency for both politics, academia, and the popular press. Politically, Israel’s right to occupy their biblical homeland is under diplomatic and military assault.  In the academy, recent studies deny that God has made an eternal promise to provide and preserve a homeland for Israel.  In addition, books aimed at a popular audience, blogs, and ministry leaders are also denying that God has committed Himself to the preservation of a land for Israel. Politics, academics, and culture converge every two years at the Christ at the Checkpoint Conference .   Munther Isaac is the driving force behind this conference.  Here is how he describes it: "In this conference we c