Skip to main content

He Created it, Its His

In my post titled "Create not Make" I made the point that God was the creator of everything and therefore has the right to rule over it.  I want to build a little on that point here. God’s creation of the land as the basis for His right to do with it as He pleases is apparent in Is. 44:1 and 24.  In v. 1 God is the maker of Israel. Then in v. 24 God asserts He is Israel’s “Redeemer, and the one who formed you from the womb, I the Lord, am the maker of all things”. His making of the nation and of all things intrinsically carries the prerogative of sovereignty giving Him the sole right to first chasten Israel, then restore them to the land that He made.  Similarly in Is. 45:12—18 God who “made the earth, and created man upon it” (v. 12) has the intrinsic right to sovereignly do as He wishes with all the nations.  Therefore, these verses assert, that because God has created the earth He has the intrinsic right to sovereignly do what He will with the earth (Is. 44:3a, 7, 24, 26—28) even the right to offer salvation throughout the earth (Is. 45:8, 49:6, 51:6, 52:10, 62:11).

The earth is at the center of God’s creation.  Since God created the earth He is intrinsically and absolutely sovereign over it.  He alone has the right to raise up nations and establish their borders and boundaries (Acts 17:26).  Since he created the sun and moon to establish time He alone has the exclusive right to determine how long nations will exist in the boundaries assigned to them.  Since He determines what is good and very good He alone has determined according to “His kind intention” (Eph. 1:5, 9) that the reason why nations are raised up, given power, then disappear from history is so that they “might grope for Him and find Him” (Acts 17:27).  His original, sovereign creative work is the ground of His intrinsic right to rule the nations and give the earth to whatever nations He chooses whenever He chooses.

Being the ultimate sovereign ruler He has the right to allocate the earth to whom He pleases.  Yet this does not mean that God is capricious or arbitrary.  On the contrary from before creation God had an ultimate end in mind.  All He does is purposeful and His actions are directed to His sovereignly determined ultimate end which is to glorify Himself.  In order to achieve his ultimate end He has sovereignly and unilaterally bound Himself to a particular course of action through unconditional and eternal covenants.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

No Need to Mind the Gap

The “Gap Theory” of Gn. 1:1-2 holds that there was an indeterminately long gap of time between Gn. 1:1 and Gn. 1:2.  During this period of time Satan fell, a pre-adamic race populated the earth, sin entered into the world, and God brought judgment in the form of a flood on His original creation.  Gn. 1:2 therefore is not an account of original creation but rather an account of the re-creation of the earth. This view was held Thomas Chalmers, Franz Delitzsh, Arthur Pink.  Some early dispensationalists such as Arno Gaebelein,  C.I. Scofield and Lewis Sperry Chafer.   Sweetnam and Magnum in their work “The Scofield Bible: Its History and Impact on the Evangelical Church” believed that the gap theory was adopted by Scofield as a way to reconcile the emerging evidence of an old earth, with the biblical account of creation.   Three arguments, syntactical, contextual, and historical are usually advanced to support a gap between Gn. 1:1 and Gn. 1:2. First, syntactically some con

Spiritual Poison: the Many Faith Destroying Mistakes of the Jesus Project

If you have been following along with my posts you will have noted a long list of the errors of the Jesus Project.   In this post I will revisit some of those and point out some others.   Certainly, the staff of the Presbyterian Community Church of the Rockies are aware of these problems.   So, you may ask, why would they invite the error laden Jesus Project to present the faith sapping results of their poor scholarship to the body of Christ in Estes Park?   The only explanation possible is that they too share the same anti-Christ agenda of the Westar Institute.   That brings me to the first of their mistakes: Agenda Drive Scholarship.   As I pointed out in my first post, the founder of the Jesus Seminar started out with an explicit agenda to undermine orthodox Christianity.   In fact, in 1998 Funk explained his vision for the future of the faith in a paper entitled The Coming Radical Reformation .   Here is one of his assertions: “The resurrection of Jesus did not involve the r

A Nation with No Land? Give Me a Break!

The relationship between God, Israel, and the land has been a topic of theological and geo-political significance since the establishment of the Abrahamic Covenant in approximately 1900 B.C.   With the birth of the modern state of Israel on 14 May 1948 questions about God, Israel, and the land have taken on new urgency for both politics, academia, and the popular press. Politically, Israel’s right to occupy their biblical homeland is under diplomatic and military assault.  In the academy, recent studies deny that God has made an eternal promise to provide and preserve a homeland for Israel.  In addition, books aimed at a popular audience, blogs, and ministry leaders are also denying that God has committed Himself to the preservation of a land for Israel. Politics, academics, and culture converge every two years at the Christ at the Checkpoint Conference .   Munther Isaac is the driving force behind this conference.  Here is how he describes it: "In this conference we c