Having
recently moved. My wife and I were visiting churches looking for a place to call
home. One of my big surprises was how much sentimentality and emotion pervades
the ministry of worship and the word. Worship and sermons often left me feeling as if I had underwent brain bypass surgery.
It is apparently, not just a local phenomenon. Just today a friend and colleague
forwarded me an email he received that is designed to entice the recipient to
sign up for a webinar on Christian witnessing. The lead in line for the webinar was that a famous
Christian apologist came to faith by first making an emotional decision, and
then later backed it up with reason. The email went on to say that nearly every
buying decision is made emotionally not intellectually. So of course I need to
learn to bypass the mind and appeal to emotions, which the webinar would teach
me to do.
I understand
and even appreciate the emotional aspects of faith. Yet, the idea that I need
to first get someone to make an emotional commitment to Christ, and only later help
them find reasons for their faith is not only manipulative but it is unbiblical. Why? First, I think
there is a false dichotomy here. But hold it, big word alert! What is a
dichotomy? It is just a fancy way of saying that the two things being compared,
in this case emotion and reason, are opposed to each other or entirely
different. So a false dichotomy is one in which two things are made to oppose one another, when they really don't. In other words, emotion and reason are not opposed to each other. Instead we find that emotion is to be controlled and informed by reason. Joshua
was told not to fear because God was
with him (Josh. 1:9), Ruth was told quell her fear because Boaz would be her redeemer (Ruth 3:11), Joseph was to set
his fear of taking Mary as his wife aside because
her conception was a work of the Spirit, and of course Jesus told His disciples
to rightly fear God because He can
destroy both soul and body (Mt. 10:28). Note the pattern here; fear was to be
controlled by reason. I think that is the relationship between emotion and
reason throughout the Bible. Emotion is to be subject to reason, not the other
way around.
Second, when
God invites His people into communion He appeals to their minds first. Check
out Isa. 1:18 where God says “Come now, let us reason together…”. When Paul
visited synagogues on his missionary journey the Bible does not say that he
appealed to their emotion. Instead it says that he reasoned with them (Acts
17:2, 18:4). In fact the Bible says that the noble-minded responded to Paul by
examining the scriptures and comparing them with what Paul said, that is they
thought through what they had heard. Lastly,
Jesus gave a warning about those who have a strong emotional response to hearing
the word preached. He said that the person who hears the word and immediately
receives it with great joy is the one who is rootless and his reception of the
word is only temporary (Mt. 13:20-21).
Now, don’t get
me wrong. I am not saying that our apologist friend isn’t deeply rooted in the
word with an enduring faith. By God’s grace I pray he is. No, what I am saying
is that this is not the way the Bible tells us to engage with others. The
example we see in the Bible is definitely not people making emotional appeals to
“buy” the Gospel of salvation by faith alone in Christ alone. Rather, we see a simple and hopefully winsome
appeal to consider the facts of God’s grace and align our emotions, and
worldview, accordingly.
By the way if you are privileged to fill a pulpit please respect the people who you shepherd enough to make an appeal to the whole person: mind, emotion, and will.
Comments
Post a Comment