Skip to main content

Meet and Return? That's Not What it Says


Then we who are alive and remain will be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air, and so we shall always be with the Lord. (1 Thess. 4:17)

 I want to call your attention to the phrase "to meet" in 1 Thess. 4:17.  It translates a Greek term apantēsis.  The standard understanding of this word, particularly by those who oppose dispensationalism, that this is a technical term that describes a formal meeting by an official delegation who goes out from a city to meet a visiting dignitary then escorts them back into the city.  When that meaning is applied to this verse then it would seem as if the saints will be caught up with Jesus in the air, then return immediately to earth, a post-tribulational rapture.  This is the interpretation of Henry Alford, James Moffat, Charles Ellicott, R.C.H. Lenski, and I. Howard Marshall.

Those who take the view that this describes a reception and escort back to the city do so even in contradiction of the way the term is used elsewhere in the New Testament.  In Mt. 25:6 the word is used to describe the meeting (apantēsis) between the bridegroom and the wedding party.  When they meet they all go to the wedding feast (v. 11).  Likewise in Acts 28:15 Paul was meet (apantēsis) by the brethren from Rome.  This meeting does is not described as a formal meeting of an official delegation.  So the two instances of this word in the New Testament both lack any evidence that the word is a technical term.

So where does the idea that apantēsis is limited to mean a formal meeting by an official delegation who escorts a dignitary back to the city come from? It originated with a man named Erik Peterson in 1929-1930.  Peterson's work has been quoted so often and so widely that it has become part of "conventional wisdom".  You know, a bit of knowledge or understanding that everyone unquestioningly accepts.  Unfortunately, its wrong.  Thank the Lord that Michael Crosby did not accept conventional wisdom.  In 1994 he published the results of an extensive study of the use of apantēsis.  He used a sophisticated digital library containing texts from the years around Paul's letter to the Thessalonians.  His search through this library produced 91 pages of instances of the use of this word.  He found only a very small number of instances where apantēsis was used in the sense of a formal delegation going out to meet a visiting dignitary and escorting them back to town.  Most of the time the word was used simply of a meeting.  In fact it is used of almost any king of meeting, even the clash of armies on a battlefield.

So this phrase in no way supports the post-tribulation view that believers ascend to meet the Lord in the air then immediately escort Him back to earth.  Rather this phrase simply means that we who are alive when Jesus returns will meet Him and remain with Him.  Furthermore, the imagery of this verse indicates not a return to earth but an ascent to heaven where the dead in Christ and those who are alive will be with the Lord safe from the coming wrath (1 Thess. 1:10) of God during the tribulation. A comfort indeed (1 Thess. 4:18).

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

No Need to Mind the Gap

The “Gap Theory” of Gn. 1:1-2 holds that there was an indeterminately long gap of time between Gn. 1:1 and Gn. 1:2.  During this period of time Satan fell, a pre-adamic race populated the earth, sin entered into the world, and God brought judgment in the form of a flood on His original creation.  Gn. 1:2 therefore is not an account of original creation but rather an account of the re-creation of the earth. This view was held Thomas Chalmers, Franz Delitzsh, Arthur Pink.  Some early dispensationalists such as Arno Gaebelein,  C.I. Scofield and Lewis Sperry Chafer.   Sweetnam and Magnum in their work “The Scofield Bible: Its History and Impact on the Evangelical Church” believed that the gap theory was adopted by Scofield as a way to reconcile the emerging evidence of an old earth, with the biblical account of creation.   Three arguments, syntactical, contextual, and historical are usually advanced to support a gap between Gn. 1:1 and Gn. 1:2. First, syntactically some con
1 comment
Read more

Spiritual Poison: the Many Faith Destroying Mistakes of the Jesus Project

If you have been following along with my posts you will have noted a long list of the errors of the Jesus Project.   In this post I will revisit some of those and point out some others.   Certainly, the staff of the Presbyterian Community Church of the Rockies are aware of these problems.   So, you may ask, why would they invite the error laden Jesus Project to present the faith sapping results of their poor scholarship to the body of Christ in Estes Park?   The only explanation possible is that they too share the same anti-Christ agenda of the Westar Institute.   That brings me to the first of their mistakes: Agenda Drive Scholarship.   As I pointed out in my first post, the founder of the Jesus Seminar started out with an explicit agenda to undermine orthodox Christianity.   In fact, in 1998 Funk explained his vision for the future of the faith in a paper entitled The Coming Radical Reformation .   Here is one of his assertions: “The resurrection of Jesus did not involve the r
Post a Comment
Read more

A Nation with No Land? Give Me a Break!

The relationship between God, Israel, and the land has been a topic of theological and geo-political significance since the establishment of the Abrahamic Covenant in approximately 1900 B.C.   With the birth of the modern state of Israel on 14 May 1948 questions about God, Israel, and the land have taken on new urgency for both politics, academia, and the popular press. Politically, Israel’s right to occupy their biblical homeland is under diplomatic and military assault.  In the academy, recent studies deny that God has made an eternal promise to provide and preserve a homeland for Israel.  In addition, books aimed at a popular audience, blogs, and ministry leaders are also denying that God has committed Himself to the preservation of a land for Israel. Politics, academics, and culture converge every two years at the Christ at the Checkpoint Conference .   Munther Isaac is the driving force behind this conference.  Here is how he describes it: "In this conference we c
Post a Comment
Read more