Skip to main content

Of The Making of Dispensations There is no End



Article 5 of the doctrinal statement of Dallas Theological Seminary, historically a defender and advocate of dispensationalism, identifies three dispensations: Law, Grace, Millennial Kingdom.  The former president of Tyndale Theological Seminary, an institution continuing to defend and promote dispensationalism, has identified twelve dispensations.  Classical dispensationalists typically hold to seven dispensations.  Why the differences?  I would offer three reasons.  First, the Bible talks a lot about the Mosaic Law, the Grace of God extended through Jesus, and the millennial kingdom.  Since there is so much Biblical revelation concerning these three dispensations, or ways in which God deals with the world, there is a wide consensus on these three.  The second, is that godly and sincere men will sometimes draw different conclusions from the same evidence, particularly on matters outside the core theological concerns of the authority and sufficiency of scripture, the nature of God, the nature of Jesus, and justification by faith.  Third, dispensationalism is not defined by the number of dispensations.  Instead, it is defined by a distinctive hermeneutic: consistently historical, grammatical, and literal; a distinctive categorization of humanity: a separation between Israel and the church; and a distinctive goal of history: that in everything God will ultimately be glorified.

Yet, if even non-dispensationalists who take the Bible seriously recognize that God does not deal with the world in the same way all the time.  At the very least everyone sees a distinction between the Old and New Testaments.  I, as a dispensationalist, embrace the dispensations of Law, Grace, and Kingdom, but are there others?  Well, it is apparent that before the law God had made promises exclusively to the nation of Israel and acted on those promises so before the law there is a dispensation of promise.  Pursuing that line of thinking a little further, before the nation of Israel was formed in Gn. 12:1-3 God was dealing with the world as a whole.  How he dealt with the world changed at the fall.  Therefore, there is a pre-fall, and a post-fall dispensation.  So far I have pre-fall and  post-fall dispensations, a dispensation of promise, then law, and finally kingdom.  After the fall however, Romans 1:18-19 suggests that man was responsible to respond to the evidence of His existence that God placed in their conscience.  Finally, also after the fall, there is a change in Gen. 9 when God deals with the sinfulness of man through human governments.  So, taking these into account, we end up with seven dispensations: pre-fall (popularly called the dispensation of innocence), a dispensation of conscience, one of government, the dispensation of promise, then law, grace, then the kingdom. So we are up to seven dispensations.  I would suggest the possibility of two more.  The first is in eternity past.  During this time, before creation, God was already making plans for humanity.  For example, the kingdom was prepared (Mt. 25:34), God chose who would believe (Eph. 1:4), the sacrificial death of Jesus was known (1 Pet. 1:20).  There is also a dispensation is eternity future, in the eternal state ushered in by Jesus when He hands His kingdom to the Father (1 Cor. 15:24).


So, what is it? Three, seven, nine, or twelve or …?  My invitation to you is to do your own investigation.  Apply a consistently literal hermeneutic, recognize the distinction the Bible makes between Israel and the church, and look for how God is bringing glory to Himself then consider how many dispensations there are.  The answer will help enrich your understanding of God’s word, help you see what God is doing in the world, and awaken you to how God wants you to respond to Him right now.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

No Need to Mind the Gap

The “Gap Theory” of Gn. 1:1-2 holds that there was an indeterminately long gap of time between Gn. 1:1 and Gn. 1:2.  During this period of time Satan fell, a pre-adamic race populated the earth, sin entered into the world, and God brought judgment in the form of a flood on His original creation.  Gn. 1:2 therefore is not an account of original creation but rather an account of the re-creation of the earth. This view was held Thomas Chalmers, Franz Delitzsh, Arthur Pink.  Some early dispensationalists such as Arno Gaebelein,  C.I. Scofield and Lewis Sperry Chafer.   Sweetnam and Magnum in their work “The Scofield Bible: Its History and Impact on the Evangelical Church” believed that the gap theory was adopted by Scofield as a way to reconcile the emerging evidence of an old earth, with the biblical account of creation.   Three arguments, syntactical, contextual, and historical are usually advanced to support a gap between Gn. 1:1 and Gn. 1:2. First, syntactically some con

Spiritual Poison: the Many Faith Destroying Mistakes of the Jesus Project

If you have been following along with my posts you will have noted a long list of the errors of the Jesus Project.   In this post I will revisit some of those and point out some others.   Certainly, the staff of the Presbyterian Community Church of the Rockies are aware of these problems.   So, you may ask, why would they invite the error laden Jesus Project to present the faith sapping results of their poor scholarship to the body of Christ in Estes Park?   The only explanation possible is that they too share the same anti-Christ agenda of the Westar Institute.   That brings me to the first of their mistakes: Agenda Drive Scholarship.   As I pointed out in my first post, the founder of the Jesus Seminar started out with an explicit agenda to undermine orthodox Christianity.   In fact, in 1998 Funk explained his vision for the future of the faith in a paper entitled The Coming Radical Reformation .   Here is one of his assertions: “The resurrection of Jesus did not involve the r

A Nation with No Land? Give Me a Break!

The relationship between God, Israel, and the land has been a topic of theological and geo-political significance since the establishment of the Abrahamic Covenant in approximately 1900 B.C.   With the birth of the modern state of Israel on 14 May 1948 questions about God, Israel, and the land have taken on new urgency for both politics, academia, and the popular press. Politically, Israel’s right to occupy their biblical homeland is under diplomatic and military assault.  In the academy, recent studies deny that God has made an eternal promise to provide and preserve a homeland for Israel.  In addition, books aimed at a popular audience, blogs, and ministry leaders are also denying that God has committed Himself to the preservation of a land for Israel. Politics, academics, and culture converge every two years at the Christ at the Checkpoint Conference .   Munther Isaac is the driving force behind this conference.  Here is how he describes it: "In this conference we c