Skip to main content

The Jesus Seminar, Westar Institute and Agenda to Destroy The Bible

The Westar Institute has a history of systematically undermining the Biblical witness of Jesus Christ extending back to the 1980’s.  So, imagine my sorrow when I noticed recently that The Presbyterian Community Church of the Rockies were inviting representatives of the Institute to come to Estes Park to share their faith-destroying message. Oh, by the way, they are happy to share their message as long as you are ready to pony up $75 per person.  What a contrast to the apostle Paul who defended the genuineness of his own ministry against false apostles, deceitful workers, and those who disguise themselves as apostles of Christ (2 Cor. 11:12) by his willingness preach and teach free of charge.  The local advertising has prompted several to ask me about the Westar Institute and the Jesus Seminar.  So, in the next several blog posts I will try to answer your questions.

So what is the Westar Institute?  The Westar Institute was founded in 1986 by the late Robert Funk.  Although Funk tried to pass off the institute as a scholarly think tank it quickly became apparent that it was, and continues to be, an agenda driven effort to undermine the Christian faith that has been honored and practiced for over 2000 years.

Funk’s initial effort at undermining the faith was, not surprisingly, aimed at hollowing out the focus of faith, Jesus Himself.  If this sounds harsh let me assure you that this was clearly Robert Funk’s goal.  Here is Funk in his own words:

What we need is a new fiction that takes as its starting point the central event in the Judeo-Christian drama and reconciles that middle with a new story that reaches beyond old beginnings and endings. In sum, we need a new narrative of Jesus, a new gospel, if you will, that places Jesus differently in the grand scheme, the epic story.

Clearly His goal was not to honor the eye-witness accounts of the person and work of Jesus.  Instead His goal was to create a “new fiction” that replaces the Jesus of the Bible with a new Jesus and new gospel.

But is this an isolated quote? Am I just taking Funk out of context?  Hardly, here is Funk again:

We should give Jesus a demotion. It is no longer credible to think of Jesus as divine. Jesus’ divinity goes together with the old theistic way of thinking about God.

The plot early Christians invented for a divine redeemer figure is as archaic as the mythology in which it is framed. A Jesus who drops down out of heaven, performs some magical act that frees human beings from the power of sin, rises from the dead, and returns to heaven is simply no longer credible. The notion that he will return at the end of time and sit in cosmic judgment is equally incredible. We must find a new plot for a more credible Jesus.

These were not the words of a scholar who wanted to carefully and objectively evaluate the evidence and draw a conclusion.  Rather they were the words of a man who was setting out to demote Jesus from the divine savior described in the gospels to a Jesus that was more aligned with his own idea of what Jesus should be.

Although it is shocking that a church should welcome representatives of an organization with this Jesus-denying agenda it is not surprising.  The apostle Paul admonished the church in Corinth from departing from the truth of the gospel when he wrote “For if one coes and preaches another Jesus who we have not preached , or you receive a different spirit which he have not received, or a different gospel which you have not accepted, you bear this beautifully.” (2 Cor. 11:4)

To carry out his agenda to undermine Christianity and undercut the faith handed down from the apostles Robert Funk created the Jesus Seminar.  To make sure that the Jesus Seminar emasculated the gospels in such a way that the goals of his anti-Christian agenda were met Funk hand picked a group of mostly like-minded people to sit in judgment on what the Bible preserves of Jesus’ life and words.  Funk cleverly included a few credible scholars to provide a patina of respectability and objectivity to the Jesus Seminar.  However, if they stepped out of line they were summarily fired.  First rate scholar Mark Roberts tells of a colleague who was a member of the Seminar but was fired by Funk when He objected that the methods they used were an intellectual sham.

One of the so-called experts selected by Funk was Paul Verhoeven.  What were Verhoeven’s qualifications to sit in judgement of the gospels?  Verhoeven is a Dutch television and movie director, producer, and screenwriter.  He has directed such Christian classics (I am being facetious here) as Diary of a Hooker, RoboCop, Total Recall , and Basic Instinct.  Apparently, his qualifications were to create R-rated stories.  Or, perhaps, Verhoeven was useful because of his access to the media?

Robert Funk was an expert at playing the media and the Jesus Seminar became ultimately a PR scheme.  In contrast to the statements He made at meetings of the Jesus Seminar, Funk publically portrayed his effort as a dispassionate, objective attempt by scholars to uncover the truth of the gospels.  Not surprisingly the media swallowed it.


By the early 90’s the Jesus Seminar ran out of things to undermine and slowly faded from sight, until recently.  Today, the Westar Institute continues to pursue Robert Funk’s agenda to undermine Christianity by applying their deceptive methods to the books the Church has identified as the New Testament.  More on this tomorrow.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

No Need to Mind the Gap

The “Gap Theory” of Gn. 1:1-2 holds that there was an indeterminately long gap of time between Gn. 1:1 and Gn. 1:2.  During this period of time Satan fell, a pre-adamic race populated the earth, sin entered into the world, and God brought judgment in the form of a flood on His original creation.  Gn. 1:2 therefore is not an account of original creation but rather an account of the re-creation of the earth. This view was held Thomas Chalmers, Franz Delitzsh, Arthur Pink.  Some early dispensationalists such as Arno Gaebelein,  C.I. Scofield and Lewis Sperry Chafer.   Sweetnam and Magnum in their work “The Scofield Bible: Its History and Impact on the Evangelical Church” believed that the gap theory was adopted by Scofield as a way to reconcile the emerging evidence of an old earth, with the biblical account of creation.   Three arguments, syntactical, contextual, and historical are usually advanced to support a gap between Gn. 1:1 and Gn. 1:2. First, syntactically some con

Spiritual Poison: the Many Faith Destroying Mistakes of the Jesus Project

If you have been following along with my posts you will have noted a long list of the errors of the Jesus Project.   In this post I will revisit some of those and point out some others.   Certainly, the staff of the Presbyterian Community Church of the Rockies are aware of these problems.   So, you may ask, why would they invite the error laden Jesus Project to present the faith sapping results of their poor scholarship to the body of Christ in Estes Park?   The only explanation possible is that they too share the same anti-Christ agenda of the Westar Institute.   That brings me to the first of their mistakes: Agenda Drive Scholarship.   As I pointed out in my first post, the founder of the Jesus Seminar started out with an explicit agenda to undermine orthodox Christianity.   In fact, in 1998 Funk explained his vision for the future of the faith in a paper entitled The Coming Radical Reformation .   Here is one of his assertions: “The resurrection of Jesus did not involve the r

A Nation with No Land? Give Me a Break!

The relationship between God, Israel, and the land has been a topic of theological and geo-political significance since the establishment of the Abrahamic Covenant in approximately 1900 B.C.   With the birth of the modern state of Israel on 14 May 1948 questions about God, Israel, and the land have taken on new urgency for both politics, academia, and the popular press. Politically, Israel’s right to occupy their biblical homeland is under diplomatic and military assault.  In the academy, recent studies deny that God has made an eternal promise to provide and preserve a homeland for Israel.  In addition, books aimed at a popular audience, blogs, and ministry leaders are also denying that God has committed Himself to the preservation of a land for Israel. Politics, academics, and culture converge every two years at the Christ at the Checkpoint Conference .   Munther Isaac is the driving force behind this conference.  Here is how he describes it: "In this conference we c